The organization first reviewed the University’s scandal beginning in 2012. Schools more often see their accreditation threatened after serious financial trouble. Wheelan said UNC’s case is unprecedented.
“This is the biggest case of academic fraud we’ve had in the 10 years I’ve been there,” she said.
Wheelan said she and her team are still reviewing the Wainstein report and will send an official letter announcing the review to UNC administrators by the end of the week.
After receiving the letter, UNC will have 30 days to self-evaluate and respond.
“Our board will then read their response, and if they feel they’ve met all the compliance issues, then there will be no further action. If not, the board can follow up for additional information,” Wheelan said.
UNC has been cooperating with SACSCOC, said University spokeswoman Karen Moon.
The organization could then issue a warning, put UNC on probation or remove its accredited status — which would end its federal financial aid and deal a serious blow to its reputation. But SACSCOC generally doesn’t drop schools without taking lesser action first, Wheelan said.